Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

July 30, 2009

John Lee, d 1737

A descendant of John Lee had his Y-DNA tested for 37 markers, and his ysearch ID is 38DR7. His genetic distance from Ralph Leigh is 1. His haplogroup is I1. The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is very likely a common ancestor for the donor and Ralph Leigh within a genealogical time frame.

If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up the donor's record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Use a value of 2 for the maximum genetic distance, and select a search of any name.

William Lee, b c1827 South Carolina, d aft 1871

A descendant of William Lee had his Y-DNA tested for 37 markers, and his ysearch ID is D7D3C. His genetic distance from Ralph Leigh is 1. His haplogroup is unknown. The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is very likely a common ancestor for the donor and Ralph Leigh within a genealogical time frame. This descendant had a perfect match for 37 markers with the descendant who supplied the YDNA for John Lee who died in 1737.

If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up the donor's record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Use a value of 2 for the maximum genetic distance, and select a search of any name.

Benjamin Lee, b c1797, d c1865

A descendant of Benjamin Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 34 markers, and he has a genetic distance of 1 with Ralph Leigh. The descendant's ysearch ID is NC44G. His haplogroup is unknown. This genetic distance indicates there is very likely a relationship between the two men.

If you are interested in further information about Benjamin Lee, use ysearch to bring up the donor's record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Use a value of 2 for the maximum genetic distance, and select a search of any name.

William Lee, b 1766, d c1855

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. His ysearch ID is DQS46. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Use a value of 2 for the maximum genetic distance, and select a search of any name.

Claude Ellison Lee, b c1896, d 1949

A descendant of Claude Ellison Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is ZWRAB. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about Claude Ellison Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William S. Lee, b 1855, d 1929

A descendant of William S. Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is MY8WB. His haplogroup is unknown. If you are interested in further information about William S. Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Ebenezer Lee, b c1832 d 1906

A descendant of Ebenezer Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is JD5EE. His haplogroup is I2b. If you are interested in further information about Ebenezeer Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Lee, b 1797, d after 1880

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 33 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is NTPRF. His haplogroup is I1a. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Lee, b c1780, d c1845

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 33 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is HWN49. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Daniel Lee, b c1784, d c1830

A descendant of Daniel Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 25 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is AUEWY. His haplogroup is unknown. If you are interested in further information about Daniel Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Lee, b c1814

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 25 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is KCCQ4. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Robert Lee, b 1927, d 1978

A descendant of Robert Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 12 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is 888M3. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant needs to be tested for more markers to obtain significant results. If you are interested in further information about Robert Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Josiah Lee, b c1745, d c1805

A descendant of Josiah Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 12 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is GZT36. His haplogroup is I1. The descendant needs to be tested for more markers to obtain significant results. If you are interested in further information about Josiah Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Lee

A descendant of John Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is 3KZJG. If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up the record his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

June 29, 2009

James "Judge" Leigh, b c1670, d 1728

A descendant of James "Judge" Leigh is of haplogroup I1a and is grouped under James "Judge" Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of James "Judge" Leigh can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 23, 2009

John Lee, b before 1694, d c1739

Two descendants of John Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com One descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. The other descendant has a genetic distance of 3 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh. There were 43 markers compared with the three men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 2 or 3 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, John Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of John Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Charles Lee, b before 1736, d 1799

A descendant of Charles Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Charles Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Needham Lee, b c1746, d 1820

A descendant of Nedham Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Needham Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Needham Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

David Lee, b c1753, d 1821

Three descendants of David Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com

Two of the descendants of David Lee have a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. One of these descendants came from a line through a son of David Lee, David Lee Jr. (his mark is "H"). The other descendant came through a son of David Lee, Abraham Lee.

The third descendant of David Lee also came through the line of David Lee Jr. (his mark is "H") but through a different son of David Lee Jr. This descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh.

All three descendants of David Lee have a mutation (relative to the descendant of Samuel Leigh) in DIS YGAT10. This implies that David Lee himself probably had that mutation. The descendant of David Lee who has the genetic distance of 2 had an additional mutation in DIS 461. That mutation probably occurred sometime later.

The three descendants of David Lee were tested for 43 markers. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry for 43 markers and by FamilyTree for 67 markers.

The genetic distances of 2 and 3 are close relationships and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the three Lee donors and the Leigh donor within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, David Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the male relative of David Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Moses Lee, b c1749, d 1806

A descendant of Moses Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Moses Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Moses Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.