The Clearing House for the Leigh & Lee Lines of the I-Haplogroup

Welcome to the Leigh & Lee DNA Clearing HouseWhat are haplogroups?

2009-09-30T23:59:00.035-06:00

When people begin reading about the use of DNA in genealogy, they see references to haplogroups, and they wonder, "What are these haplogroup things?" This post gives a brief answer to that question.

People have traditionally performed genealogical research by studying written documents. A new dimension has been added to genealogical research: the use of DNA. Each person has a "blueprint" in their body that contains information or instructions for the makeup and operation of their body. That blueprint is called DNA.

DNA is passed from parent to child in two ways. The Y-chromosome, that is passed from father to son, carries DNA information, and this information is referred to as Y-DNA. DNA information is also passed from mother to daughter and is known mtDNA. Y-DNA is used in genealogy because it is passed from father to son, and genealogical research is based on father-to-child relationships. Genealogists are beginning to use mtDNA, but its use isn't as widespread as that of Y-DNA.

Included in DNA is information about the origin of some of the person's ancestors. Humans are believed to have originated in Africa. The DNA of those ancient people was passed on to their children. However, occasional changes or mutations in DNA occurred, and the changes were also passed on to their descendants. As people spread over the earth, changes to DNA caused distinct patterns of DNA segments to appear. Today, those patterns are called haplogroups, and they give a general idea where particular genealogical lines came from tens of thousands of years ago.

The following chart shows how various Y-DNA haplogroups have separated from the original haplogroup that was in Africa, and the chart shows that haplogroups are a convenient way of identifying different genealogical lines. For example, many of the Leigh/Lee lines in the United Kingdom are of haplogroup RB1. Some of the Leigh/Lee lines in the UK, though, are of haplogroup I. The chart shows that the RB1 and I haplogroups originated from different people in different parts of the world, and this leads to the conclusion that the Leigh/Lee lines of haplogroup I are not related in a genealogical time frame to the Leigh/Lee lines of haplogroup RB1. Of course, haplogroup I is a large group of people, and not all of the Leigh/Lee lines in that haplogroup are related to each other.

Click the picture for a larger view of the chart.

This site focuses on the genealogy of people of haplogroup I. The ancient people who became haplogroup I migrated towards Scandinavia. This migration spread the DNA of the migrants among local folks. Further spreading of the haplogroup I DNA occurred during the ice age by migrations from Scandinavia to the Balkans, southern France, Iberia (present day Spain and Portugal) and Italy. During the middle ages, the Vikings invaded a wide area in Europe for about 200 years and spread their DNA throughout that area. As a result, haplogroup I is found today in many countries in addition to the Scandinavian countries, but that haplogroup is not common in most countries outside of Scandinavia.

The common ancestor between two Y-DNA donors

2009-09-30T23:55:00.002-06:00

People doing genealogical research will have identified their most distant ancestor. This ancestor might be themselves, a father, a grandfather, a great grandfather, or someone further back in their family tree. The researchers may want to know whether or not that ancestor is related to other persons who often but not always have the same surname. In doing traditional genealogical research, the researchers try to obtain written records that will tell them if their ancestor is related to the other persons. However, such records may be difficult to locate and may not even exist. Since the Y-DNA markers do exist for male descendants of the two lines being investigated, the researchers can compare the Y-DNA markers of a male descendant from each line to determine if the two persons are related in some way. The use of Y-DNA can't give an exact relationship between two people, but it can tell if it is likely the two persons are related via a common ancestor. People who are likely related to each other will have most of their Y-DNA values the same. The fewer the values that are different, the more likely that the two persons have a common ancestor.

Let's consider an example of the use of Y-DNA to determine if two people might be related. This is a real-life example, but the names and locations have been changed to protect the privacy of the two persons, both of whom are still living.

John Leigh lives in Colorado. His great grandfather on his father's side immigrated from Wales to the United States. John has researched his great grandfather's Leigh line in Wales and has identified his earliest known Leigh ancestor. John had his DNA tested with the hope that someone in England will have Y-DNA that is a close match with his Y-DNA, thus giving him a general idea of where in England his earliest ancestor might have lived.

Michael Lee lives in Virginia. He has researched his Lee line back to his grandfather on his father's side, but he has not been able to extend his family tree past his grandfather. Michael assumes that the Lee ancestor who immigrated to the United States came from England, but Michael does not know who that ancestor was or when he came to the United States. Michael had his DNA tested with the hope that someone who has identified the Lee immigrant will have Y-DNA that matches with his Y-DNA.

After both men had completed their DNA testing, they were notified by the company doing the testing that they have a close match with each other and that it is likely the two men have an ancestor who is common to both of the men. The presence of a common ancestor is important because the common ancestor provides a link between the two lines, thus establishing a relationship between the lines. Michael was surprised at his close match with John, because he never suspected that his family tree might go into Wales. John explained to Michael that the common ancestor might have lived before John's branch went to Wales. If this is the case, Michael's family tree might not go into Wales, even though John's family tree does go into Wales.

As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, this example is a real-life example of how DNA testing gave new information that brought two distant relatives together and gave one of the relatives an understanding that his family tree might go into Wales. Now, because it is likely that John and Michael have a common ancestor, they can assist each other in further research into the identity and whereabouts of the Lee immigrant who came to the United States. To help Michael with his research, John has identified several places in his family tree in Wales where sidelines could have sprouted from his main line and later furnished the Lee immigrant.

Genetic Distance

2009-09-30T23:50:00.005-06:00

When two people learn that they might be related to each other because their Y-DNA have a close match, they wonder how close their relationship might be. Y-DNA results can not specify an exact relationship between the two people. The best it can do is give a general idea of their relationship. This is because the mutations that occur in the Y-DNA occur randomly. In addition, some values of Y-DNA mutate more often than other values.

Ancestry and FamilyTreeDNA have different ways of specifying an approximate relationship between two people. The Ancestry site gives the number of generations to the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) for a 50% probability. The probability factor is involved since Y-DNA can't give exact relationships. FamilyTreeDNA gives the genetic distance between the two people, where genetic distance is the number of differences in the values of the markers of the two men. For example, if the genetic distance is 2, there are two ways that that genetic distance could exist. The two men might have two DNA markers that differ by a value of 1 for each marker, or they might have one DNA marker that differs by a value of 2. Without additional DNA testing there is no way of knowing when and in which line(s) the mutations occurred.

This post gives information from FamilyTreeDNA that will help us estimate the closeness of a relationship based on the genetic distance of the two men. The more markers that were tested, the wider the range of genetic distance that can exist and still have a relationship. Here are links to the information from FamilyTreeDNA. The following information on relationships was taken from the FAQ at familytreedna.com (http://www.familytreedna.com/faq/answers/default.aspx?faqid=9#913) That page is worth reading, because it will clarify interpretations of
DNA results.

	Y-DNA12	Y-DNA25	Y-DNA37	Y-DNA67	Interpretation
Very Tightly Related	N/A	N/A	0	0	Your exact match means your relatedness is extremely close. Few people achieve this close level of a match. All confidence levels are well within the time frame that surnames were adopted in Western Europe.
Tightly Related	N/A	N/A	1	1-2	Few people achieve this close level of a match. All confidence levels are well within the time frame that surnames were adopted in Western Europe.
Related	0	0-1	2-3	3-6	Your degree of matching is within the range of most well established surname lineages in Western Europe. If you have tested with the Y-DNA12 or Y-DNA25 test, you should consider upgrading to additional STR markers. Doing so will improve your time to common ancestor calculations.
Possibly Related	1	2	4	7	Without additional evidence, it is unlikely that you share a common ancestor in recent genealogical times (1 to 6 generations). You may have a connection in more distant genealogical times (7 to 15 generations). If you have traditional genealogy records that indicate a relationship, then by testing additional individuals you will ether prove or disprove the connection.
Probably Not Related	2	3	5	8-9	It is highly unlikely that you share a common ancestor in genealogical times (1 to 15 generations). Should you have traditional genealogy records that indicate a relationship, then by testing additional individuals you will ether prove or disprove the connection. A careful review of your genealogical records is also recommended.
Not Related	3	4	6	10	You are not related on your Y-chromosome lineage within recent or distant genealogical times (1 to 15 generations).

As you use this information, don't "nit pick" the numbers. If the genetic distance is on the border of a possible relationship or no relationship, give yourself the benefit of the doubt and assume a possible relationship.

Even though Ancestry doesn't give genetic distance values, persons using Y-DNA values from Ancestry can still obtain genetic distance values by counting the number of markers that are different for the two persons, as explained above.

Finding and using the Leigh & Lee DNA information in this site

2009-09-30T23:45:00.049-06:00

This site has information about each Leigh or Lee man who has had his Y-DNA tested by Ancestry or FamilyTreeDNA and has been identified as being haplogroup I. Review the information to see if the people fit into your family tree. If one or more persons do fit into your family tree, you can accept their DNA information as pertaining to your family, although members of your family may have slightly different values for their DNA markers due to mutations. To contact the men who had their Y-DNA tested, send emails to the contact persons given in the ysearch results (FamilyTreeDNA) or to the descendants who had their DNA tested by Ancestry (as explained in the months of May and June).

Note about Ancestry: The Lee DNA Genealogy Project used to have a guest account that would allow you to view the records in the group. The login information, which is still given in the page for the group, doesn't work. You apparently will have to request a membership in the group as a researcher, or buy a kit and have your Y-DNA tested.

DNA isn't a Silver Bullet

DNA can give you general information about your ancestors, but you will still need to verify that information with traditional research in genealogical documents. The information you receive from the descendants will, hopefully, give you ideas about where to look for additional genealogical documents, and your research in those documents will, hopefully, give you more detailed information about your ancestors.

If none of the people fit into your family tree, information provided by the descendants may help you locate new genealogical documents that may allow you to connect to one or more of the people.

Navigating this Site

Because this site is actually a blog, the pages of this site are organized into years and months. The links to DNA testing of individual people are placed into particular months, as follows.

September 2009 - Introduction to this site. Links to various pages of this site
August 2009 - Leigh lines from FamilyTree
July 2009 - Lee lines from FamilyTree
June 2009 - Leigh lines from Ancestry
May 2009 - Lee lines from Ancestry

Using ysearch to search the ysearch database

2009-09-30T23:30:00.007-06:00

FamilyTreeDNA has a free website called ysearch.org that can be used to search the ysearch database of persons who have had their Y-DNA tested. The ysearch database contains marker values that have been transferred from the FamilyTreeDNA database of test-values. Not all persons who are tested have their marker-values transferred to ysearch. You can use ysearch to search by last name or by genetic matches with a specific ysearch ID.

Search by Last Name

This search can be performed by anyone. You enter the last name and the regions of the world you went tested. The Results page will show the name you searched and in the Name or Variants column a link to all of the records that were found. Click the link and you will get a page with all of the records that were found. Have a little patience, because the search may take a few seconds.

The first column in your results is Compare, and that column has a check box for each record found. Click the check box for all of the records you want to keep (if you want most of the records, click Check All and then click the ones you don't want to keep). When you have selected all of the records that you want to keep, click the name of the column (Compare) which is underlined to show it is a link. Choose if you want to show comparative Y-DNA results or genetic distances. Your report will be created, and you can print it.

Search for Genetic Matches

Enter the ysearch ID of the man who will be the reference for the genetic matches. You will then be asked to enter search parameters. Keep the default that the user tested at least 8 of the markers that were tested for the reference person. Nobody tests less than 12 markers, so all people who were tested should be included in the results. You can specify a maximum for the genetic distances to be reported, or you can specify a maximum genetic distance of 1 per marker. To begin with, choose the second choice of 1 per marker. Choose how you want the last name to limit the search. Choose how you want haplogroups to limit the search, and choose the regions of the world you want included in the search. Then click the Search button.

This search can be performed by anyone who has access to a ysearch ID of a man who had his Y-DNA tested by FamilyTreeDNA. For example, women can use the ID of their husbands or of male relatives to do genetic matches with that man. Have a little patience, because the search may take a few seconds.

The first column in the results is Compare, and that column has a check box for each record found. Click the check box for all of the records you want to keep (if you want most of the records, click Check All and then click the ones you don't want to keep). When you have selected all of the records that you want to keep, click the name of the column (Compare) which is underlined to show it is a link. Select if you want to show comparative Y-DNA results or genetic distances. Your report will be created, and you can print it.

Create a New User

If you have recently had the Y-DNA of a male family member tested by FamilyTreeDNA, you can go to ysearch and click the Create a New User tab to create an account for the person who was tested. Then, you can click a field in that person's account at the FTDNA web site to have his test results (marker values) automatically sent to ysearch. When you first create the account on ysearch, you will be given a ysearch ID, and you can use that ID to perform genetic matches.

Other Tabs

There are a few other tabs in ysearch that you can explore at your leisure.

A useful technique for data from Ancestry

2009-09-30T23:25:00.003-06:00

In displaying names in its site, Ancestry groups the data from its testing into subgroups. Each subgroup has names that the server thinks are closely related to each other. It is helpful if you reorder the data in a subgroup to make your person the reference person for that subgroup. By doing this, the number of generations in the MRCA column will be relative to your person, and having your person at the top of the list makes it easier to visually compare the Y-DNA markers of your person with the markers of those who are most closely related to him.

Here is the procedure to make your person the reference for the subgroup.

Place the mouse cursor on the name of your person. You will see a down arrow at the left of the name.
Click the down arrow and select "Make this person the reference person"

The names in that subgroup will be reordered with your person at the top of the list, and all of the MRCA numbers will be relative to your person.

Another option is to change the View field at the top of the page to be "Sorted List" instead of "Genetic Subgroups (default)". This will remove the subgroups and will place all of the names in one list. You can make your person the reference person, as explained above, and you can check if persons in other subgroups are closely related to your person. However, this procedure does not reorder the list by MRCA number, and persons most closely related to your person will likely be scattered throughout the list. In addition, many of the MRCA numbers may be a dash (-) due, I assume, to the number being too large to fit in the field.

Uploading your markers to ysearch

2009-09-30T23:15:00.009-06:00

Many of you who visit this site had your Y-DNA tested by a company other than FamilyTreeDNA. Yet, you would like to use ysearch to compare your markers with those who were tested by FamilyTreeDNA. It is possible to upload your markers to the ysearch database, and this page gives you the step-by-step procedure. I recommend that you do this to give you access to a larger reservoir of individuals who have been tested.

Go to ysearch.org and click the Create a New User link to create your account. This step gives you an empty account on ysearch, that is, an account with no marker-values.
Manually enter your Y-DNA values from the company that tested your DNA. Be careful in doing this, because the order of the values in ysearch may not be the same as the order of the values given you by the lab who tested your DNA.
Correct certain values as given in the correction page of ysearch. This correction is necessary, because different labs have slightly different ways of testing your DNA.

NOTE: Due to a recent change made by Ancestry, do not subtract 11 from the value for the GATA-H4 marker.

You now have your marker-values uploaded to the ysearch database, and you can use ysearch to compare your values with those of persons who were tested by FamilyTreeDNA. By doing this upload, you will be able to compare your Y-DNA with a much greater range of people.

If you do upload values to ysearch, please email me at genealogy (at) welshleigh (dot) org so I can add your new ysearch ID to the Clearing House.

Uploading your markers to Ancestry

2009-09-30T23:00:00.001-06:00

If you were tested by a lab other than Ancestry, you can upload your markers to Ancestry. Doing this will broaden the pool of Y-DNA markers that are available for comparison with your markers. Follow these steps.

Go to ancestry.com and click the DNA button.
If you have an account with Ancestry, log in. If not, create a free account.
Click the Paternal (Y-chromosome) button.
Click the name of the lab that tested you and click Continue
Manually enter your haplogroup and your marker values. Ancestry will automatically convert certain values for compatibility with its database. Click Submit when you have finished entering the values.

Leigh & Lee DNA Q&A

2009-09-30T22:00:00.007-06:00

Have questions about using DNA in your genealogical research but don't know who to ask? This is the place! Leave your questions in comments, and we'll reply with our answers. If we don't know an answer, we'll refer you to the staff at FamilyTreeDNA.

Should I join a user group or project?

2009-09-30T21:00:00.014-06:00

There are several companies that test DNA for genealogical purposes. The two companies that are used most often are FamilyTreeDNA and Ancestry. FamilyTreeDNA was the first company to test DNA, and it has the largest database of DNA values. Both companies have groups or projects that focus on particular genealogical lines. Both companies give discounts to persons who join a group before they are tested.

User Groups

FamilyTreeDNA has two user groups or projects that focus on Lee and Leigh lines of any haplogroup and one user project that focuses on Lee and Leigh lines of haplogroup I1. If you go to FamilyTreeDNA and do a surname search for Leigh or Lee, you won't see the I1 group in the list of projects. You can, though, go directly to the website for that group. Once you are in the website, if you haven't been tested, you can click a link to join that group and, if you wish, purchase at the discount price a kit to have your DNA tested by FamilyTreeDNA. There is a special price for persons who have been tested by other labs and want to be tested by FamilyTreeDNA. If you have been tested by FamilyTreeDNA, you can click the link to join the I1 group and have that group added to your list of projects you have joined. I am the moderator of the I1 group as well as of this site.

Ancestry has several groups that focus on Lee lines, and the largest group is the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Official and Unofficial Members

To be an "official" member of the FamilyTreeDNA project that focuses on the I1 haplogroup, you must be tested by FamilyTreeDNA. Persons who are interested in the I1 haplogroup but were tested by another company are invited to visit the website for the I1 project and participate as "unofficial" members (email me with your request so I can welcome you into the group). Unofficial members have full activity with the group website and with this Clearing House. The only disadvantage is that their Y-DNA markers are not displayed in the group website.

Reasons for Joining a Group

People who are considering being tested or have recently been tested wonder if they should join a group. Here are ways user groups might help you.

User groups may offer a discount for the testing.
User groups are one way to connect with people who have similar interests and goals in genealogy. This will facilitate the sharing of information among members of the group, and they provide social relationships among genealogists.
User groups provide access to the marker values of other members of the group.
User groups may provide tutorial information about DNA testing.

Leaving comments on posts in this site

2009-09-30T20:00:00.005-06:00

If you have information about a particular ancestor who is listed in this site, you can put that information in this site by posting a comment to the page of that ancestor. The procedure for posting a comment will ask you to select your profile. If you don't already have a Google profile, or a profile from another website that is accepted by Google, you can create a Google profile (free) or you can submit your comment without an actual profile.

In creating Google profiles, keep in mind that your profile will be online and available to not only persons interested in genealogy but to persons and computer programs called bots that want to send you spam. Thus, use caution in deciding what information to put in your profile. Normally, we only post our first names, and we don't give postal addresses or even the name of the city in which we live. We also don't give email addresses. If you do want your email address to be given but want to keep spam bots from obtaining your email address, you can disguise your email address in some way such that live persons can recognize your address but computer bots won't recognize it. The method I use is to give my "name" and my email domain but to disguise the @ symbol and the . symbol. For example, I give my email address as genealogy (at) welshleigh (dot) org Some people will create a Google profile but leave all the fields blank.

If you want to post a comment but not give a profile, select the Name/Web option from the list of profiles. Use your first name (or an alias) in the Name field. If you have a family history or genealogy site that pertains to your comment, you can put a link to that site in the Link field; otherwise, leave the Link field blank.

Observations about the DNA data

2009-09-30T19:45:00.000-06:00

This page contains observations that I've made about the DNA of Leigh and Lee lines. The comments are made as I think of them and are in no particular order.

The following comments apply to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com

Almost all of the Lees that are grouped under Randaulph Lee have the same mutation in DYS # Y-GATA-A10. Because there are many donors of the DNA, this might imply there is a common ancestor of all those Lees and that the common ancestor also had that mutation.

Reuben Lee b c1798, d 1880 and Bryant Lee, b c1803 have a perfect match of the 26 markers that were compared. It is thus likely that they have a common ancestor in a genealogical time frame. However, the donors of the DNA should be tested for more markers to confirm this.

What's new at the Leigh & Lee DNA Clearing House

2009-09-30T19:30:00.003-06:00

So, you've been here before? That's great! This page lists the changes that have been made to the site and to the DNA data. Newer changes are at the top of the list.

Added Thomas Green Lee, b. 1858 to the FamilyTreeDNA lines.
Added a post explaining how to make your person the reference for the names in the Ancestry subgroup containing your person
Added a post explaining genetic distance
Added a post explaining the importance of a common ancestor
Added a post explaining how to give a comment to the page of an ancestor
Added Recent Comments to the left sidebar
Added William Lee, b c1740, d 1807 to the Ancestry Lee lines
Added a post explaining how to upload values from other labs into Ancestry.
Added John Lee, b 1770, d 1832 to the Ancestry Lee lines
Added a post explaining how to upload values from other labs into the ysearch database.
Added all of the Leigh and Lee listings from the ysearch site.
Added all of the Lee and Leigh listings in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at Ancestry

August holds Leigh lines from FamilyTreeDNA

2009-08-31T23:59:00.005-06:00

All Leigh lines from Ancestry are in this month. This information came from a website called ysearch.org. The site can be used by anyone for free, and it is provided by FamilyTreeDNA. ysearch was used to search for all persons with a surname of leigh and a haplogroup of I or its subgroups, and a Genetic Distance Report was created.

Ralph Leigh, b c1560, d c1614

2009-08-30T23:59:00.006-06:00

Several lines descending from Ralph Leigh are well documented in the Leigh Descendancy Chart at the Welsh Leigh web site from traditional research. These lines are of the I1 haplogroup. The likely 67-marker Y-DNA of Ralph Leigh has been identified, and the researchers are hoping that DNA will provide a bridge to the ancestors of Ralph Leigh. They believe those ancestors lived in England, but they have no genealogical documents that substantiate that belief.

Three descendants of Ralph Leigh were involved in our determination of Ralph's Y-DNA markers. They are referred to as a descendant of Samuel Leigh, a descendant of Rector Daniel Leigh, and a descendant of William Leigh. Their ysearch IDs are 66XXS, H8G3U, and KGYRY, respectfully. You can use ysearch to display the values of their markers.

The descendant of Samuel has a perfect match with the markers that we believe belong to Ralph Leigh, and this person is the reference for the genetic matches reported by ysearch. The descendant of Rector Daniel Leigh has a genetic distance of 4 to Ralph Leigh, and the descendant of William Smith has a genetic distance of 1 to Ralph Leigh.

Rev. Edmund Leigh, chr 1736, d 1819

2009-08-30T23:45:00.007-06:00

Two descendants of the Rev. Edmund Leigh had their Y-DNA tested for 67 markers. These descendants are of the I1 haplogroup.

A descendant of Samuel Leigh has the ysearch ID of 66XXS. As explained in the welshleigh site, his DNA markers are a perfect match with those believed to belong to Ralph Leigh, and this descendant is the reference for the genetic distances given in this page. The genetic distances reported in this website will be given relative to Ralph Leigh rather than to this descendant. This descendant also had his Y-DNA tested by Ancestry for 47 markers. Because the Rev. Edmund Leigh is in the line having the perfect match with Ralph Leigh, unless compensating mutations occurred, the Rev. Edmund Leigh also has a perfect match with Ralph Leigh.

A descendant of Rector Daniel Leigh has the ysearch ID of H8G3U, and his genetic distance from Ralph Leigh and from the Rev. Edmund Leigh is 4. The difference between this descendant and the Rev. Edmund Leigh is only five generations, and the genetic distance would normally be less than 4. However, the genetic mutation that caused the genetic distance of 4 happened to be in markers that change rapidly, causing the genetic distance to be larger than normal.

Oakley Leigh, b c1640, d 1709

2009-08-30T23:15:00.006-06:00

A descendant of Oakley Leigh had his Y-DNA tested for 67 markers, and his ysearch ID is KGYRY. He is of the I1 haplogroup. His genetic distance from Ralph Leigh is 1. Ralph Leigh is the father of Oakley Leigh (I listed this person as a descendant of Oakley Leigh instead of Ralph Leigh so I could list Oakley Leigh in the Title of this post). You can use ysearch to display the 67 markers of this person. We don't know if the mutation causing the genetic distance of 1 was before or after Oakley Leigh. It would take further testing of other descendants of Ralph Leigh to make that determination.

James Leigh, b c1670, d 1728

2009-08-30T23:00:00.010-06:00

Two descendants of James Leigh were tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. Their haplogroups are unknown. Their ysearch IDs are Q57M8 and RDMQS. If you are interested in further information about James Leigh, use ysearch to bring up the records for James and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Leigh, b c1792, d 1867

2009-08-30T22:45:00.003-06:00

A descendant of John Leigh was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 66 markers. His haplogroup is I1. The descendant's ysearch ID is KKUTA. If you are interested in further information about John Leigh, use ysearch to bring up the record for John and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Leigh, b unknown, d unknown

2009-08-30T22:30:00.003-06:00

A descendant of John Leigh was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is 6ZY57. If you are interested in further information about John Leigh, use ysearch to bring up the record his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Ferdinando Leigh, b 1716, d 1779

2009-08-30T22:15:00.003-06:00

A descendant of Ferdinando Leigh was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is A48RA. If you are interested in further information about John Leigh, use ysearch to bring up the record his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Francis Leigh, b c1622, d c1684

2009-08-30T22:00:00.000-06:00

A descendant of Francis Leigh was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is UF8HD. If you are interested in further information about Francis Leigh, use ysearch to bring up the record his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

July holds Lee lines from FamilyTreeDNA

2009-07-31T23:59:00.005-06:00

All Lee lines from FamilyTreeDNA are in this month. This information came from a website called ysearch.org. The site can be used by anyone for free, and it is provided by FamilyTreeDNA. ysearch was used to search for all persons with a surname of lee, and a Genetic Distance Report was created.

John Lee, d 1737

2009-07-30T23:00:00.009-06:00

A descendant of John Lee had his Y-DNA tested for 37 markers, and his ysearch ID is 38DR7. His genetic distance from Ralph Leigh is 1. His haplogroup is I1. The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is very likely a common ancestor for the donor and Ralph Leigh within a genealogical time frame.

If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up the donor's record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Benjamin Lee, b c1797, d c1865

2009-07-30T22:55:00.004-06:00

A descendant of Benjamin Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 34 markers, and he has a genetic distance of 1 with Ralph Leigh. The descendant's ysearch ID is NC44G. His haplogroup is unknown. This genetic distance indicates there is very likely a relationship between the two men.

If you are interested in further information about Benjamin Lee, use ysearch to bring up the donor's record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Henry Lee, b c1597, d c1657

2009-07-30T22:50:00.003-06:00

A descendant of Henry Lee had his Y-DNA tested for 67 markers, and his ysearch ID is H7AFZ. His genetic distance from Ralph Leigh is 3. His haplogroup is I1. The genetic distance of 3 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the donor and Ralph Leigh within a genealogical time frame.

If you are interested in further information about Henry Lee, use ysearch to bring up the donor's record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Thomas Green Lee, b. 1858

2009-07-30T22:45:00.007-06:00

A descendant of Thomas Green Lee had his Y-DNA tested for 25 markers, and his ysearch ID is PZEDH. His genetic distance from Ralph Leigh is 0. His haplogroup is I1. The genetic distance of 0 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the donor and Ralph Leigh within a genealogical time frame. However, he needs to be tested for additional markers.

If you are interested in further information about Thomas Green Lee, use ysearch to bring up the donor's record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name or one of my variant last names.

William Lee, b 1766, d c1855

2009-07-30T22:45:00.006-06:00

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. His ysearch ID is DQS46. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Charles Lea (not Lee), b 1664, d c1735

2009-07-30T22:30:00.004-06:00

A descendant of Charles Lea was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is E2AWS. His haplogroup is I1a. If you are interested in further information about Charles Lea, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Claude Ellison Lee, b c1896, d 1949

2009-07-30T22:15:00.004-06:00

A descendant of Claude Ellison Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is ZWRAB. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about Claude Ellison Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William S. Lee, b 1855, d 1929

2009-07-30T22:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William S. Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is MY8WB. His haplogroup is unknown. If you are interested in further information about William S. Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Ebenezer Lee, b c1832 d 1906

2009-07-30T21:45:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Ebenezer Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is JD5EE. His haplogroup is I2b. If you are interested in further information about Ebenezeer Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Josiah Lee, b c1740, d c1895

2009-07-30T21:30:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Josiah Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is BBHYB. His haplogroup is unknown. If you are interested in further information about Josiah Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Peter Lee, b c1650

2009-07-30T21:15:00.002-06:00

A descendant of 50 Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 54 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is YXR7B. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about Peter Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

James Lee, b c1804, d 1876

2009-07-30T21:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of James Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 39 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is ZNMEJ. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about James Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Robert Lee, b c1785, d c1870

2009-07-30T20:45:00.003-06:00

A descendant of Robert Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is CCWG6. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about Robert Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Lee, d 1796

2009-07-30T20:30:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is Y32CW. His haplogroup is unknown. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Lee, b 1797, d after 1880

2009-07-30T20:15:00.003-06:00

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 33 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is NTPRF. His haplogroup is I1a. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Lee, b c1780, d c1845

2009-07-30T20:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 33 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is HWN49. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Richard Lee

2009-07-30T19:45:00.003-06:00

A descendant of Richard Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 30 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is N2E54. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about Richard Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Daniel Lee, b c1784, d c1830

2009-07-30T19:30:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Daniel Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 25 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is AUEWY. His haplogroup is unknown. If you are interested in further information about Daniel Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Lee, b c1814

2009-07-30T19:15:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 25 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is KCCQ4. His haplogroup is I1. If you are interested in further information about William Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Robert Lee, b 1927, d 1978

2009-07-30T19:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Robert Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 12 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is 888M3. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant needs to be tested for more markers to obtain significant results. If you are interested in further information about Robert Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Josiah Lee, b c1745, d c1805

2009-07-30T18:30:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Josiah Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 12 markers. The descendant's ysearch ID is GZT36. His haplogroup is I1. The descendant needs to be tested for more markers to obtain significant results. If you are interested in further information about Josiah Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Lee, b 1785, d 1858

2009-07-30T18:16:00.001-06:00

A descendant of John Leigh was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is 3VB54. If you are interested in further information about John Leigh, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Andrew Lee, b c1770, d c1850

2009-07-30T17:30:00.001-06:00

A descendant of Andrew Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is MDTNH. If you are interested in further information about Andrew Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Lee, b c1760, d 1814

2009-07-30T17:15:00.001-06:00

A descendant of John Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 42 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is XX4TX. If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Lee, d c1739

2009-07-30T17:00:00.001-06:00

A descendant of John Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 43 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is U5TW6. If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Lee

2009-07-30T16:45:00.000-06:00

A descendant of John Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is 3KZJG. If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up the record his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Milton Lee, b 1840, d 1926

2009-07-30T16:30:00.001-06:00

A descendant of Milton Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 12 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is AXEYW. If you are interested in further information about Milton Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

This descendant needs to be tested for 37 or 67 markers to give significant results. 12 markers is not enough.

Matthew Lee, b c1724, d c1777

2009-07-30T16:15:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Matthew Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 42 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is D598T. If you are interested in further information about Matthew Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John Lee, b 1811

2009-07-30T16:00:00.001-06:00

A descendant of John Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 25 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is ES7X9. If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

John P. Lee, b 1811, d 1877

2009-07-30T15:45:00.001-06:00

A descendant of John P. Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 67 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is MPGF2. If you are interested in further information about John P. Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

William Thomas Lee, b 1818, d c1868

2009-07-30T15:30:00.001-06:00

A descendant of William Thomas Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is PCZS7. If you are interested in further information about William Thomas Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Sir Humphrey Lee, b c1496, d c1538

2009-07-30T15:15:00.000-06:00

A descendant of Sir Humphrey Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 12 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is RFS8E. If you are interested in further information about Sir Humphrey Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

This descendant needs to be tested for 37 or 67 markers to insure reliable results.

Joshua Lee, b c1755, d 1800

2009-07-30T15:00:00.001-06:00

A descendant of Joshua Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. His haplogroup is I. The descendant's ysearch ID is TAPE6. If you are interested in further information about Joshua Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

Zachariah Lee, b 1765, d 1838

2009-07-30T14:45:00.000-06:00

A descendant of Zachariah Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 12 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is UFFBM. If you are interested in further information about Zachariah Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

This descendant needs to be tested for 37 or 67 markers to insure reliable results.

John Lee, b 1811

2009-07-30T14:30:00.000-06:00

A descendant of John Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 25 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is V27MV. If you are interested in further information about John Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

This descendant needs to be tested for 37 or 67 markers to insure reliable results. 25 markers is the edge of reliable or not reliable results.

Daniel Lee, b c1762, d c1841

2009-07-30T14:15:00.001-06:00

A descendant of Daniel Lee was tested by FamilyTreeDNA for 37 markers. His haplogroup is unknown. The descendant's ysearch ID is Z5VM6. If you are interested in further information about Daniel Lee, use ysearch to bring up his record and click the link to email the contact person given on that record. In using ysearch, do a Search for Genetic Matches and enter the ysearch ID for the descendant. Keep the default of 0 for the maximum genetic distance, and select Only show people with my last name.

June holds Leigh lines from Ancestry

2009-06-30T23:59:00.009-06:00

All Leigh lines from Ancestry are in this month.

Hopefully, people interested in the lines given in this month will contact the descendants of the Leigh men who had their Y-DNA tested. They can do this by going to the Home page of the Lee DNA Genealogy Project, clicking on the People tab, and then clicking on the entries for Desc of XXX Leigh, where XXX is the given names of the earliest known ancestors that were specified by the men being tested.

James "Judge" Leigh, b c1670, d 1728

2009-06-29T23:00:00.003-06:00

A descendant of James "Judge" Leigh is of haplogroup I1a and is grouped under James "Judge" Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of James "Judge" Leigh can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Samuel Leigh, b 1815, d 1894

2009-06-29T22:00:00.000-06:00

A descendant of Samuel Leigh is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant is the same person who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh, the earliest known Leigh of this line. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The line going from this descendant to Ralph Leigh in Wales has been proven and is documented in the welshleigh site. The connection from Ralph Leigh in Wales to Ralph Leigh or his ancestors in England has not be identified, and we hope Y-DNA testing will give clues about when and where this change in location occurred.

May holds Lee lines from Ancestry

2009-05-31T23:59:00.006-06:00

All Lee lines from the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at Ancestry are in this month.

Hopefully, people interested in the lines given in this month will contact the descendants of the Lee men who had their Y-DNA tested. They can do this by going to the Home page of the Lee DNA Genealogy Project, clicking on the People tab, and then clicking on the entries for Desc of XXX Lee, where XXX is the given names of the earliest known ancestors that were specified by the men being tested.

John Lee, b before 1694, d c1739

2009-05-23T23:30:00.004-06:00

Two descendants of John Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com One descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. The other descendant has a genetic distance of 3 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh. There were 43 markers compared with the three men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 2 or 3 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, John Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of John Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Charles Lee, b before 1736, d 1799

2009-05-23T23:15:00.004-06:00

A descendant of Charles Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Charles Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Needham Lee, b c1746, d 1820

2009-05-23T23:00:00.003-06:00

A descendant of Nedham Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Needham Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Needham Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

David Lee, b c1753, d 1821

2009-05-23T22:45:00.007-06:00

Three descendants of David Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com

Two of the descendants of David Lee have a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. One of these descendants came from a line through a son of David Lee, David Lee Jr. (his mark is "H"). The other descendant came through a son of David Lee, Abraham Lee.

The third descendant of David Lee also came through the line of David Lee Jr. (his mark is "H") but through a different son of David Lee Jr. This descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh.

All three descendants of David Lee have a mutation (relative to the descendant of Samuel Leigh) in DIS YGAT10. This implies that David Lee himself probably had that mutation. The descendant of David Lee who has the genetic distance of 2 had an additional mutation in DIS 461. That mutation probably occurred sometime later.

The three descendants of David Lee were tested for 43 markers. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry for 43 markers and by FamilyTree for 67 markers.

The genetic distances of 2 and 3 are close relationships and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the three Lee donors and the Leigh donor within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, David Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the male relative of David Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Moses Lee, b c1749, d 1806

2009-05-23T22:45:00.005-06:00

A descendant of Moses Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Moses Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Moses Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Josiah Lee, b c1755, d 1807

2009-05-23T22:30:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Josiah Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Josiah Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Josiah Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The marker that was different from that of the descendant of Samuel Leigh was DYS # 19A and was not the DYS # Y-GATA-A10 that was different for the other descendants having a genetic distance of 1.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Benjamin Lee, b c1765, d c1818

2009-05-23T22:15:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Benjamin Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 42 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 2 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Benjamin Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Benjamin Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Stephen Lee, b 1769, d 1834

2009-05-23T22:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Stephen Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 27 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 27 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Stephen Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of of Stephen Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Samuel Lee Sr, b c1772

2009-05-23T21:45:00.002-06:00

Two descendants of Samuel Lee Sr. are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The first descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the first descendant of Samuel Lee Sr. and the descendant of Samuel Leigh. The second descendant of Samuel Lee Sr. has a genetic distance of 1 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh. However, that descendant of Samuel Lee Sr. only had 27 markers tested, and his results are questionable. He should have more markers tested to confirm these results. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 2 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Samuel Lee Sr. lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Samuel Lee Sr. who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Timothy Lee, b 1772, d 1845

2009-05-23T21:30:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Timothy Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 27 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 27 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Timothy Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Timothy Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

David Lee, b before 1781, d 1821

2009-05-23T21:15:00.002-06:00

A descendant of David Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, David Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of David Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Sherod Lee, b c1795, d 1835

2009-05-23T21:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Sherod Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Sherod Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of David Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

William Lee, b c1797, d after 1880

2009-05-23T20:45:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, William Lee was born and died in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of William Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Benjamin Lee, b c1797, d 1860 or 1870

2009-05-23T20:30:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Benjamin Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 34 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Benjamin Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Benjamin Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Reuben Lee, b c1798, d 1880

2009-05-23T20:15:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Reuben Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 26 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 26 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Reuben Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Reuben Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Garrow or Garry Lee, b 1799, d 1869

2009-05-23T20:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Garrow or Garry Lee is of haplogroup I1a and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Garrow or Garry Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Garrow or Garry Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Bryant Lee, b c1803

2009-05-23T19:45:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Bryant Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 26 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 26 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Bryant Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Bryant Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

L. Nathaniel Lee, b c1809, 1890

2009-05-23T19:30:00.004-06:00

A descendant of L. Nathaniel Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, L. Nathaniel Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of L. Nathaniel Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Darling Lee, b 1811, d 1885

2009-05-23T19:15:00.003-06:00

A descendant of Darling Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Darling lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Darling Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Needham Brown Lee, b c1825, d 1914

2009-05-23T19:10:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Needham Brown Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Needham Brown Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Needham Brown Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

James F. or L. Lee, b 1825

2009-05-23T19:00:00.003-06:00

A descendant of James F. or L. Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, James F. or L. Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of James F. or L. Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

James L. Lee, b 1838, d 1915

2009-05-23T18:45:00.003-06:00

A descendant of James L. Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, James L. Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of James L. Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Randaulph Lee, b. c1839, d 1921

2009-05-23T18:30:00.002-06:00

Two descendants of Randaulph Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The first descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. The second descendant has a genetic distance of 2. There were 43 markers compared between the three men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 or 2 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the three donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Randaulph Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Randaulph Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Thomas Green(e) Lee, b 1858, d 1899

2009-05-23T18:00:00.001-06:00

A descendant of Thomas Green(e) Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Thomas Green(e) Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Thomas Green(e) Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

James Lee, b 1765, d 1851

2009-05-22T16:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of James Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James "Judge" Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of James Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William Lee, b c1780, d 1840

2009-05-22T14:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James "Judge" Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

John G. Lee, b c1797, d 1860

2009-05-21T19:00:00.001-06:00

A descendant of John G. Lee is of haplogroup I2a and is grouped under Jodie Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John G. Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

John H. Lee, b 1799, d 1858

2009-05-21T18:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of John H. Lee is of haplogroup I2a and is grouped under Jodie Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John H. Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Jodie Lee, b 1881, d 1966

2009-05-21T17:00:00.001-06:00

A descendant of Jodie Lee is of haplogroup I2a and is grouped under Jodie Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Jodie Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William Lee, b c1727, d 1796

2009-05-20T23:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under William "Fairfax" Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William Lee, b c1740, d 1807

2009-05-20T22:52:00.000-06:00

William "Fairfax" Lee, b c1741, c1807

2009-05-20T22:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William "Fairfax" Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under William "Fairfax" Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William "Fairvax" Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

John Lee, b 1770, d 1832

2009-05-20T21:52:00.000-06:00

A descendant of John Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under William "Fairfax" Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William Lee, b 1766, d before 1860

2009-05-19T23:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Thomas Edward Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Thomas Edward Lee, b 1829, d 1862

2009-05-19T22:00:00.002-06:00

A descendant of Thomas Edward Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Thomas Edward Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Thomas Edward Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Richard Lee "The Immigrant", b. 1618, d 1664

2009-05-18T22:00:00.002-06:00

Three descendants of Richard Lee "The Immigrant" are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Richard Lee "The Immigrant" in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of these descendants of Richard Lee "The Immigrant" can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

James B. Lee, b c1804, d 1876

2009-05-17T22:00:00.001-06:00

Three descendants of James B. Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under James B. Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of these descendants of James B. Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.