May 31, 2009

May holds Lee lines from Ancestry

All Lee lines from the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at Ancestry are in this month.

Hopefully, people interested in the lines given in this month will contact the descendants of the Lee men who had their Y-DNA tested. They can do this by going to the Home page of the Lee DNA Genealogy Project, clicking on the People tab, and then clicking on the entries for Desc of XXX Lee, where XXX is the given names of the earliest known ancestors that were specified by the men being tested.

May 23, 2009

John Lee, b before 1694, d c1739

Two descendants of John Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com One descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. The other descendant has a genetic distance of 3 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh. There were 43 markers compared with the three men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 2 or 3 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, John Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of John Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Charles Lee, b before 1736, d 1799

A descendant of Charles Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Charles Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Needham Lee, b c1746, d 1820

A descendant of Nedham Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Needham Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Needham Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

David Lee, b c1753, d 1821

Three descendants of David Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com

Two of the descendants of David Lee have a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. One of these descendants came from a line through a son of David Lee, David Lee Jr. (his mark is "H"). The other descendant came through a son of David Lee, Abraham Lee.

The third descendant of David Lee also came through the line of David Lee Jr. (his mark is "H") but through a different son of David Lee Jr. This descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh.

All three descendants of David Lee have a mutation (relative to the descendant of Samuel Leigh) in DIS YGAT10. This implies that David Lee himself probably had that mutation. The descendant of David Lee who has the genetic distance of 2 had an additional mutation in DIS 461. That mutation probably occurred sometime later.

The three descendants of David Lee were tested for 43 markers. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry for 43 markers and by FamilyTree for 67 markers.

The genetic distances of 2 and 3 are close relationships and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the three Lee donors and the Leigh donor within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, David Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the male relative of David Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Moses Lee, b c1749, d 1806

A descendant of Moses Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Moses Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Moses Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Josiah Lee, b c1755, d 1807

A descendant of Josiah Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Josiah Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Josiah Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The marker that was different from that of the descendant of Samuel Leigh was DYS # 19A and was not the DYS # Y-GATA-A10 that was different for the other descendants having a genetic distance of 1.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Benjamin Lee, b c1765, d c1818

A descendant of Benjamin Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 42 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 2 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Benjamin Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Benjamin Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Stephen Lee, b 1769, d 1834

A descendant of Stephen Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 27 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 27 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Stephen Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of of Stephen Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Samuel Lee Sr, b c1772

Two descendants of Samuel Lee Sr. are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The first descendant has a genetic distance of 2 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the first descendant of Samuel Lee Sr. and the descendant of Samuel Leigh. The second descendant of Samuel Lee Sr. has a genetic distance of 1 from the descendant of Samuel Leigh. However, that descendant of Samuel Lee Sr. only had 27 markers tested, and his results are questionable. He should have more markers tested to confirm these results. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 2 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Samuel Lee Sr. lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Samuel Lee Sr. who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Timothy Lee, b 1772, d 1845

A descendant of Timothy Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 27 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 27 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Timothy Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Timothy Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

David Lee, b before 1781, d 1821

A descendant of David Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, David Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of David Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Sherod Lee, b c1795, d 1835

A descendant of Sherod Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Sherod Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of David Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

William Lee, b c1797, d after 1880

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, William Lee was born and died in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of William Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Benjamin Lee, b c1797, d 1860 or 1870

A descendant of Benjamin Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 34 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Benjamin Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Benjamin Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Reuben Lee, b c1798, d 1880

A descendant of Reuben Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 26 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 26 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Reuben Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Reuben Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Garrow or Garry Lee, b 1799, d 1869

A descendant of Garrow or Garry Lee is of haplogroup I1a and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Garrow or Garry Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Garrow or Garry Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Bryant Lee, b c1803

A descendant of Bryant Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 26 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

Because only 26 markers were compared, the genetic distance of 1 is questionable. Any likelihood of a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors is also questionable. Bryant Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Bryant Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

L. Nathaniel Lee, b c1809, 1890

A descendant of L. Nathaniel Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, L. Nathaniel Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of L. Nathaniel Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Darling Lee, b 1811, d 1885

A descendant of Darling Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Darling lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Darling Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Needham Brown Lee, b c1825, d 1914

A descendant of Needham Brown Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Needham Brown Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Needham Brown Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

James F. or L. Lee, b 1825

A descendant of James F. or L. Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, James F. or L. Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of James F. or L. Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

James L. Lee, b 1838, d 1915

A descendant of James L. Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, James L. Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of James L. Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Randaulph Lee, b. c1839, d 1921

Two descendants of Randaulph Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The first descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. The second descendant has a genetic distance of 2. There were 43 markers compared between the three men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 or 2 is a close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the three donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Randaulph Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Randaulph Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

Thomas Green(e) Lee, b 1858, d 1899

A descendant of Thomas Green(e) Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Randaulph Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com The descendant has a genetic distance of 1 from a descendant of Samuel Leigh who is believed to have the same Y-DNA marker values as Ralph Leigh. There were 43 markers compared between the two men. The descendant of Samuel Leigh was tested by Ancestry as well as by FamilyTree.

The genetic distance of 1 is a very close relationship and indicates there is likely a common ancestor for the two donors within a genealogical time frame from the donors. However, Thomas Green(e) Lee lived in the United States while Ralph Leigh was likely born in England and lived most of his life in Wales. Information about the ancestor of Thomas Green(e) Lee who immigrated to the United States is unknown at this time.

The Possible Immigrants page of the Welsh Leigh site that documents Ralph Leigh lists 21 places in the Leigh Descendancy Chart where side lines could have furnished immigrants to the United States. In addition, the sidelines could have been created prior to the birth of Ralph Leigh.

May 22, 2009

James Lee, b 1765, d 1851

A descendant of James Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James "Judge" Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of James Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William Lee, b c1780, d 1840

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James "Judge" Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 21, 2009

John G. Lee, b c1797, d 1860

A descendant of John G. Lee is of haplogroup I2a and is grouped under Jodie Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John G. Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

John H. Lee, b 1799, d 1858

A descendant of John H. Lee is of haplogroup I2a and is grouped under Jodie Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John H. Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Jodie Lee, b 1881, d 1966

A descendant of Jodie Lee is of haplogroup I2a and is grouped under Jodie Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Jodie Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 20, 2009

William Lee, b c1727, d 1796

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under William "Fairfax" Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William Lee, b c1740, d 1807

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under William "Fairfax" Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William "Fairfax" Lee, b c1741, c1807

A descendant of William "Fairfax" Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under William "Fairfax" Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William "Fairvax" Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

John Lee, b 1770, d 1832

A descendant of John Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under William "Fairfax" Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 19, 2009

William Lee, b 1766, d before 1860

A descendant of William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Thomas Edward Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Thomas Edward Lee, b 1829, d 1862

A descendant of Thomas Edward Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Thomas Edward Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Thomas Edward Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 18, 2009

Richard Lee "The Immigrant", b. 1618, d 1664

Three descendants of Richard Lee "The Immigrant" are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under Richard Lee "The Immigrant" in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of these descendants of Richard Lee "The Immigrant" can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 17, 2009

James B. Lee, b c1804, d 1876

Three descendants of James B. Lee are of haplogroup I1 and are grouped under James B. Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of these descendants of James B. Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 16, 2009

Joshua Lee, b 1713, d 1743

A descendant of Joshua Lee is of haplogroup I2b1 and is grouped under John Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Joshua Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

John Lee Sr, b c1745, d c1795

A descendant of John Lee Sr. is of haplogroup I2b1 and is grouped under John Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John Lee Sr. can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

John Lee, b c1794, d 1880

A descendant of John Lee is of haplogroup I2b1 and is grouped under John Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 15, 2009

Abner Lee, b 1760, d 1852

A descendant of Abner Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James Young Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Abner Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

George Lee, b before 1791, d 1803

A descendant of George Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James Young Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of George Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Jehu Lee, b c1795, d 1848

A descendant of Jehu Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James Young Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Jehu Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William Miller Lee, b 1796, d 1852

A descendant of George Miller Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James Young Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of George Miller Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

James Young Lee, b 1836, d before 1900

A descendant of James Young Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under James Young Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of James Young Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 14, 2009

John Lee, b c1772, d 1816

Two descendants of John Lee are of haplogroup I2b1 and are grouped under John Leigh in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of these descendants of John Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 13, 2009

Nathaniel Lee, b c1826, d after 1848

A descendant of Nathaniel Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Nathaniel Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Nathaniel Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Jessie (James?) William Lee, b 1848, d after 1883

A descendant of Jessie (James?) William Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Nathaniel Lee in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Jessie (James?) William Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

May 12, 2009

John Lee, b c1720, d 1793

A descendant of John Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Not Assigned in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of John Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Peter Lee, b 1773, d 1841

A descendant of Peter Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Not Assigned in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Peter Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

William R. Lee Jr, b 1835, d 1898

A descendant of William R. Lee Jr. is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Not Assigned in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of William R. Lee Jr. can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Ebenezer Lee, b. 1833, d 1906

A descendant of Ebenezer Lee is of haplogroup I2b1 and is grouped under Not Assigned in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Ebenezer Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Ralph Leigh, b. c1788, d after 1820

A descendant of Ralph Lee is of haplogroup I2b1 and is grouped under Not Assigned in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Ralph Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

Aaron Allen Lee, b 1809, d 1885

A descendant of Aaron Allen Lee is of haplogroup I1 and is grouped under Not Assigned in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of Aaron Allen Lee can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.

David Lee?, b before 1781, d 1821

A descendant of David Lee? is of haplogroup I2b1 and is grouped under Not Assigned in the Lee DNA Genealogy Project at ancestry.com Persons interested in the DNA of the descendant of David Lee? can go to the Lee DNA Genealogy Project.